Opinion please.

Sarah Winfield

Registered
20 Jun 2016
1,080
231
79
Dorset
Best answers
0
Country flag
All my track and my few pieces of rolling stock items are LGB. PIKO appears to be more economical. Would I be best not trying to just have LGB?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

PhilP

G Scale, 7/8th's, Electronics
5 Jun 2013
33,592
3,525
Nottingham
Best answers
0
Country flag
Oh Sarah! :eek:
Asking for an opinion on a Forum such as this! ;):giggle::giggle::giggle:

The rail is the same 'code' (size).
The brass will be a different colour, and with take differing times to weather.
The sleeper spacing will be different.
The sleeper shape will be slightly different.
The sleeper colour will be slightly different.

But once it has been down for several months, in the garden, you will not notice any of the above.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Neil Robinson

Registered
24 Oct 2009
9,699
579
N W Leicestershire
Best answers
0
Country flag
You need have no worries about mixing these two brands. Run whatever you like best on whatever track you wish.
In general Piko rolling stock is based on standard gauge prototypes whereas LGB can be both narrow and standard. Piko is generally cheaper and arguably a little less robust but still of very good quality.
 

Zerogee

Clencher's Bogleman
25 Oct 2009
17,354
1,724
North Essex
Best answers
0
Country flag
As Phil and Neil have said, you can mix-and-match freely between LGB and Piko track (and many other brands too). For rolling stock and locos, as long as you feel they look "about right" together then go with it! Couplings will all match up (certainly with European stuff if using standard hook-and-loop couplers, American style "knuckles" are another thing entirely) and the Piko stock, while generally being models of standard gauge prototypes as Neil mentioned above, usually comes with alternative buffer beams so you can use standard-gauge style twin buffers or the narrow-gauge style single centre buffer as you prefer.

Jon.
 

mike

Master at annoying..
Staff member
GSC Moderator
24 Oct 2009
51,810
4,444
Rossendale
www.gscalecentral.net
Best answers
0
Country flag
Best yes .but only if you want purity of sleepers.. in reality no..mix match ..
As said..Piko tends to be standard gauge and lgb tends to be narrow gauge stock..the choice is yours
I tried Piko points and was disappointed with them..
 

GAP

G Scale Trains, HO Trains, 1:1 Sugar Cane trains
14 Jun 2011
4,061
947
Bundaberg Queensland, Australia
Country
Australia
ringbalin-light-railway.blogspot.com
Best answers
0
Country flag
All my track and my few pieces of rolling stock items are LGB. PIKO appears to be more economical. Would I be best not trying to just have LGB?

I use the LNER rule to choose my pieces of equipment and track.

LNER = Look Near Enough Right?

Rule 8 Its your railway do what you want with it, if others tell you they don't like the look of it; tell them to stop looking.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

SophieB

Registered
24 Sep 2017
38
24
67
Elizabeth City, NC, USA
Best answers
0
Country flag
Our track is a hodge podge of LGB, Aristocraft and USA Trains, though when buying new we stick to USA T because over here it's cheaper and I like the way the ties stay connected to the track if you take the coupling plate off. The only concern, as fas as I am concerned, is to ensure that you stay with all European or all US tie/sleeper spacing. We don't have any Pico track due simply to what was available.

As far as rolling stock goes we have a bit of everything. All of our stock gets hook and loop couplers as we place a higher priority on reliability and interchangeability than we do the more realistic look of knuckle couplers.
 

Gizzy

A gentleman, a scholar, and a railway modeller....
26 Oct 2009
36,152
2,278
63
Cambridgeshire
www.gscalecentral.net
Best answers
0
Country flag
On the real railway, you will see different types of sleepers and rail.

I have mostly LGB (code 332) track, although I also have some ART, PIKO and Train-line track. All have a similar spacing of sleepers, although the colouring and shape are slightly different. As said before, once weathered and ballasted, you wouldn't notice the difference.

So Sarah, if you can save a few quid by buying a certain manufacturers track over another, then do it. It's all pretty much the same stuff at the end of the day....
 

ge_rik

British narrow gauge (esp. Southwold and W&LLR)
24 Oct 2009
10,702
1,244
Cheshire
www.riksrailway.blogspot.com
Best answers
0
Country flag
Hi Sarah
As has been said - mix and match is fine. My track is a combination of LGB, Piko, Trainline and Tenmille (EDIT: oh yes, and Aristocraft) - they all work alongside each other perfectly (even the Tenmille which is a different profile).

My rolling stock is a complete hodge-podge including the cheapest of the lot - HLW - http://www.h-l-w.com/products.html .

Rik
 
Last edited:

stockers

Trains, aircraft, models, walking, beer, travel
24 Oct 2009
25,631
3,795
65
Nr. Ashford, Kent. England.
Best answers
0
Country flag
I use what ever cropped up at the right price - including Aristocraft USA style track with smaller, closer sleepers (the rail is the same size). It all looks fine once it's down. If your trying to save a few quid - look at secondhand track - it is tough stuff so usually OK. Having said that - dont trust e-bay - track frequently sells on there for more than new - god only knows why. The main oddball is Peco (not Piko) which uses a smaller rail profile, but even that can be joined with special joiners (which I think are garbage) or a pair of pliers on a standard metal joiner.
 

maxi-model

UK/US/ROW steam narrow gauge railways 1:1
27 Oct 2009
5,673
661
Bucks/Oxon/Northants area
Best answers
0
Country flag
One of the big benefits of LGB's code 332 rail based track system is that it has numerous "compatibles" from rival makes. As mentioned - Piko, Aristocraft, Trainline, Bachmann, USA Trains, Accucraft, etc'. While there may be differences in sleeper spacing, colour and some aspects of their geometries they all fit together without, or with minimal, need for any adapters.

Some of these rival makes offer the advantage of producing some specialised track components, that LGB may not have in its range. These can be used to overcome particular operational issues - e.g. Piko's curved points. There are also those businesses, like Garden Railway Specialists, who can provide bespoke track solutions based on LGB's code 332 rail profile to meet more specific needs, like dual gauge operation. Max
 

tac foley

Registered
11 Apr 2017
4,266
1,008
78
Near Huntingdon, UK
Best answers
0
Country flag
I use the LNER rule to choose my pieces of equipment and track.

LNER = Look Near Enough Right?

Rule 8 Its your railway do what you want with it, if others tell you they don't like the look of it; tell them to stop looking.

Stolen. :)

tac
Ottawa Valley GRS
 

chris m01

Registered
24 Oct 2009
4,546
424
Birmingham, UK
Best answers
0
Country flag
When I started out in G about 18 years ago I bought 60 odd foot of secondhand Aristocraft track. It had obviously been out in someone’s garden for some time before I bought it. It is still in use on my main line and giving no problems at all. Over the years I have had a policy of buying whatever track was at the best price and never had a problem.
I have used both LGB and Aristo points, again no major problems. Aristo points need to have the screws underneath tightened after about 15 years.

The one thing I avoid is LGB R1 curves and their equivalent in other makes.

USA Trains is my favourite brand for locos and rolling stock.
 

Hutch

G Gauge, Raising Peaches, Apricots
1 Feb 2012
467
116
Southwest Oklahoma, USA
Best answers
0
I have a mixture of brands, primarily LGB and AristoCraft. The only problem I have had is with AML flex track. The rail profile is about 10 thousandths taller than the other brands, it required some creative filing to ease the joint at each end. Luckily there is only one 3 foot section to deal with.
 

spoz

What do I do? What I'm told by SWMBO
27 Oct 2011
2,573
150
Adelaide, South Australia
Best answers
0
Country flag
I've got a mixture of LGB and Piko, both ordinary track and points, mostly R3 in LGB speak which is R5 in Piko speak (that difference can be a little confusing) and a few (LGB) R1s and Piko equivilants in the shed which is the storage area.

Some of each type had been down for a decade or so, and some of it gets walked on regularly. As has been said above, after that time I would find it hard to determine which was which but for the fact that the point lever system is different. I use batteries so I can't comment about electrical durability, but certainly from the physical durability perspective there is little to choose in the normal track, and I actually prefer the Piko points because they are mechanically a little simpler - and as noted, cheaper.

Mike, be interested to know what your bad experiences were?
 

trammayo

Interested in vintage commercial vehicle, trams, t
24 Oct 2009
22,675
4,685
75
Co. Mayo
Country
Ireland
Best answers
0
Country flag
When I started my line (2005), track could be obtained new for around 2.50 sterling a foot. I bought the 5ft lengths (rail in a tube) of LGB track with the sleeper lengths in a box. In my opinion, LGB track has superb weathering qualities and looks like the real thing when the natural process is complete. I have Aristocraft track which has black sleepers (a lot which have weathered to a light grey), Piko track, AMS track - both having brown sleepers.

Piko points can (and do) suffer from electrical problems - as can early LGB ones. Both can be sorted if you have a little patience.

So, in a nut shell, I have a large variety of different length and varying curve radii. It all weathers down eventually and, if you ballast it (it doesn't have to be bedded on ballast just around it) it looks fine.

20th March, 18 -   (4).JPG
As for space, take the advice and go for larger radiused curves if you can (just in case the bug bites and you end up running far larger locos and trains than you ever imagined!),

But R1 curves can be useful and do work - I have a self-contained layout in a trailer which is all R1's (points, curves and reverse curves) plus straights of course!

As for length, I use 300mm, 600mm, 900mm,, 1200mm and 1500mm (the latter three sizes in the garden). In the trailer, the shorter lengths have the nice, pre-continuously welded rail. clikety click!

That's my six pen'orth!
 

Paul M

Registered
25 Oct 2016
11,909
1,698
61
Royston
Best answers
0
Country flag
When I started my line (2005), track could be obtained new for around 2.50 sterling a foot. I bought the 5ft lengths (rail in a tube) of LGB track with the sleeper lengths in a box. In my opinion, LGB track has superb weathering qualities and looks like the real thing when the natural process is complete. I have Aristocraft track which has black sleepers (a lot which have weathered to a light grey), Piko track, AMS track - both having brown sleepers.

Piko points can (and do) suffer from electrical problems - as can early LGB ones. Both can be sorted if you have a little patience.

So, in a nut shell, I have a large variety of different length and varying curve radii. It all weathers down eventually and, if you ballast it (it doesn't have to be bedded on ballast just around it) it looks fine.

View attachment 234783
As for space, take the advice and go for larger radiused curves if you can (just in case the bug bites and you end up running far larger locos and trains than you ever imagined!),

But R1 curves can be useful and do work - I have a self-contained layout in a trailer which is all R1's (points, curves and reverse curves) plus straights of course!

As for length, I use 300mm, 600mm, 900mm,, 1200mm and 1500mm (the latter three sizes in the garden). In the trailer, the shorter lengths have the nice, pre-continuously welded rail. clikety click!

That's my six pen'orth!
All that track has got to be worth more than 6d
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

ARIA31

Registered
3 Oct 2017
250
54
74
Toulouse - France
Best answers
0
Country flag
One difference between Piko and LGB is that to create a 600 mm lenth rail,
LGB is using 2 units 300 mm rails
while Piko is using 1 unit 280 mm plus one unit 320 mm

Then it is not sometimmes so easy to have a 100% satisfactory track so mixing brands ??
 

mikanmart

Registered
17 Mar 2012
194
25
London
Best answers
0
A bit late in catching up , but using one type of track on the main line and the other on sidings can look OK , and hiding errant track in the undergrowth can help .
 

dunnyrail

DOGS, Garden Railways, Steam Trains, Jive Dancing,
Staff member
GSC Moderator
25 Oct 2009
26,206
4,997
75
St.Neots Cambridgeshire UK
Best answers
0
Country flag
I am using LGB, Aristo, Train Line and mostly Peco for its nice small section and sensible radius curves on the points.

Before I moved to this new house and line I purchased a good supply of Aristo 4ft Radius Curves as that was to be my desired norm on the main lines.

Below can be seen the change from Aristo 4ft Rad curves to Peco point.
image.jpeg
Below interface between a Train Line R2 point and Peco Rail in my Shed.
image.jpeg
Below also in my shed a change between Peco and LGB.
image.jpeg
Finally out side Peco LGB Aristo 4ft Rad Curveimage.jpeg
Note how I do not worry too much about the changes,mthe track above is not in a sceniced area so to be honest looks a bit rough but runs fine.

Note how the Aristo Curve even after over 5 years outside has not tarnished from its yellow. This Is not the case for LGB, Train Line or Peco Rail. All tarnishing over not a very long time to a nuce satisfying dark colour.

I do use mostly Rail Clamps and have some that interface between Peco and 332 Rail quite nicely. For Electrical Sections I try to make them at the interface between 332 and Peco Rail with the Peco Interface Fishplate (Peco SL912 G-45 Dual Joiners) as can be seen top left join in the above shot. If you leave out the short section of Nickle Strip they are insulated.

To be honest I am not sure that I would trust them ling term outside for Live Connection. But I stand to be corrected by someone on the forum who has been using them thus for donkeys years!
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    355.4 KB · Views: 0
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user